Barry
Crown is a renowned roundabout expert from the United Kingdom who has
designed I believe hundreds of roundabouts in his career, including
several in the United States. Barry has put together a response to the
Wall Street Journal article that I think Motasem and many other traffic
engineers should read. The text of his response is included below:
ROUNDABOUTS
IN THE UNITED STATES
The article in
the Wall Street Journal painted a black picture about roundabout safety
and their suitability for the United States. The Clearwater Roundabout
was cited. This response fills in the gaps in the article and redresses
the balance.
The design of the
Clearwater Roundabout was uncommonly complex. It converted 5 intersections
into one intersection that had to accommodate Spring Break traffic volumes
of 50,000 vehicles and 6,000 pedestrians per day. The aims of the Landscape
Architects and the Fountain Designers also contributed to the design
complexity. The design sought to find the best balance between these
unavoidably conflicting aims.
The roundabout
has had a large number of vehicle crashes at the exit onto the Causeway
and at the exit into Coronado Drive. However, there have been no pedestrian
accidents at the roundabout. This clearly reveals that the best balance
was not initially achieved.
In July 2001, my
recommended revisions to signing, striping, and lane arrows were introduced
at the Causeway exit. The crashes subsequently dropped from an average
of 25 to 0 crashes per month. There have been no crashes at this location
since that time.
This clearly demonstrates
that the fault was with design detail and not the drivers.
To resolve the
crash problem at the Coronado Drive exit the curbs need to be realigned.
This work will be completed by the end of February 2002 when a dramatic
reduction in crashes is expected. (Similar to the reduction at the Causeway
Exit.)
Over the past twelve
years about 300 hundred modern roundabouts have been constructed in
the United States. Almost all have been unqualified successes. A study
commissioned by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety determined
that roundabouts in the United States have reduced all crash types by
40% and injury crashes by 80%, at sites where they replaced other types
of intersection. We do not know of any other type of highway
improvement that has such a high success rate.
Considering that
the US Engineers are relatively new and inexperienced at roundabout
design it is to their credit that their failure rate is only a few percent.
This is exemplified by US public opinion, that is typically about 80-90%
against building a roundabout, but after construction this soon changes
to about 80-90% in favor.
The lesson to be
learnt is not that roundabouts a bad for the US, but that design faults
lead to failure while good design produces roundabouts that are safer
than any other type of at-grade intersection in the United States.
R.B. Crown
28th January 2002